Information on Result #476902
There is no (95, 259, 178)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 152560 267781 356027 845362 074118 754302 458692 234839 378692 866161 143633 933800 708688 > 2259
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 260, 178)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |