Information on Result #476909

There is no (109, 259, 219)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 122221 563083 475604 122971 842415 464426 124960 719585 241633 267536 274726 788533 406078 > 2259

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (109, 260, 219)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction