Information on Result #476962

There is no (215, 259, 31649)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 926733 803261 124516 458337 378388 845485 948530 849064 425652 369719 718181 441955 559184 > 2259

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (215, 260, 31649)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction