Information on Result #477234

There is no (16, 32, 146)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1941 671202 207057 > 332

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 33, 146)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction