Information on Result #477369
There is no (21, 43, 170)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 334 826696 540272 119777 > 343
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 44, 170)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |