Information on Result #477654

There is no (32, 60, 322)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 42624 795428 925801 991761 918477 > 360

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 61, 322)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction