Information on Result #477671
There is no (27, 61, 169)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 127295 076617 557979 853812 996115 > 361
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (27, 62, 169)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |