Information on Result #477712

There is no (31, 63, 243)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 216365 295975 645208 186688 371425 > 363

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (31, 64, 243)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction