Information on Result #477774

There is no (32, 66, 240)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 32 249649 133733 722180 914625 610721 > 366

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 67, 240)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction