Information on Result #477862

There is no (32, 70, 210)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2701 008127 990210 321045 722386 263921 > 370

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 71, 210)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction