Information on Result #478492

There is no (38, 94, 200)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 741 098692 074236 408220 707575 760619 787186 318657 > 394

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (38, 95, 200)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction