Information on Result #478740

There is no (44, 102, 251)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4 745039 649968 355046 890821 842608 442589 405707 146303 > 3102

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (44, 103, 251)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction