Information on Result #478836

There is no (43, 105, 228)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 134 585769 351066 538717 382482 580227 164523 264669 363761 > 3105

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (43, 106, 228)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction