Information on Result #479006

There is no (44, 110, 226)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 32893 698672 034044 169645 025365 091716 515805 250231 188101 > 3110

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (44, 111, 226)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction