Information on Result #479622

There is no (92, 126, 12321)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 310079 654694 036688 858531 346386 969394 805292 783781 115436 683779 > 3126

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (92, 127, 12321)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction