Information on Result #479677

There is no (48, 128, 228)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11 865821 676882 308604 093985 394399 335188 247590 030570 742124 824257 > 3128

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (48, 129, 228)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction