Information on Result #479724

There is no (63, 129, 451)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 35 829128 198082 169703 757518 036803 280679 885106 883472 532633 074759 > 3129

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (63, 130, 451)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction