Information on Result #479837

There is no (48, 132, 222)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 981 584631 427719 332754 876330 731889 625965 254788 665125 744333 217549 > 3132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (48, 133, 222)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction