Information on Result #479845

There is no (64, 132, 450)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1013 299138 421437 271853 669489 344259 184224 637571 056031 736284 305877 > 3132

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 133, 450)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction