Information on Result #481055

There is no (51, 159, 217)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 7516 996605 299099 177971 286953 712474 727674 620844 830036 491060 616945 478907 001609 > 3159

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 160, 217)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction