Information on Result #481263

There is no (71, 163, 398)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 603061 858085 109019 520165 549067 679546 486518 190322 078557 820843 652624 241083 638741 > 3163

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (71, 164, 398)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction