Information on Result #481305

There is no (54, 164, 232)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 825282 159492 083364 188316 006088 021608 412712 162571 033582 754265 012915 789819 767265 > 3164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (54, 165, 232)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction