Information on Result #481305
There is no (54, 164, 232)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 825282 159492 083364 188316 006088 021608 412712 162571 033582 754265 012915 789819 767265 > 3164
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (54, 165, 232)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |