Information on Result #481336

There is no (116, 164, 8903)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 771467 065917 585497 121962 118505 301821 255237 688266 009768 733478 554247 403244 853329 > 3164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 165, 8903)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction