Information on Result #481341

There is no (126, 164, 52041)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 770005 927816 707247 057117 020475 938606 650493 351786 706513 845123 265271 766027 964475 > 3164

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 165, 52041)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction