Information on Result #481406

There is no (54, 166, 231)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 17 906413 449655 453804 558493 544708 494712 927297 468003 338017 934436 146688 334893 590545 > 3166

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (54, 167, 231)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction