Information on Result #481561

There is no (57, 169, 248)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 492 389096 818886 926355 646322 378771 328013 861151 601312 349964 144635 418980 659533 389057 > 3169

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (57, 170, 248)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction