Information on Result #481636

There is no (102, 170, 1612)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1307 539914 814864 679769 468012 998761 043236 687392 806647 343697 338948 258057 050368 372969 > 3170

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 171, 1612)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction