Information on Result #481667

There is no (59, 171, 260)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4552 795636 440215 338239 977023 024765 815364 867687 353481 780714 476228 950938 074391 517505 > 3171

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (59, 172, 260)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction