Information on Result #481718

There is no (56, 172, 239)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 12616 335239 283312 211913 384123 389096 180107 254266 687968 412532 573871 733311 382759 263085 > 3172

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 173, 239)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction