Information on Result #481880

There is no (57, 175, 243)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 334955 298032 151137 560958 718229 454649 371870 563971 236985 570124 576791 406081 330275 317371 > 3175

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (57, 176, 243)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction