Information on Result #481975

There is no (138, 176, 104174)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 940519 710848 858914 668169 541279 224723 516197 939941 524551 337636 466664 873082 550010 664353 > 3176

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (138, 177, 104174)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction