Information on Result #482176

There is no (102, 180, 1189)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 78 628837 809275 013385 705483 188709 793199 994971 320850 885662 754951 079271 686734 417844 536027 > 3180

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 181, 1189)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction