Information on Result #483199
There is no (64, 198, 270)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 30046 697124 721304 107298 991059 097651 380356 217411 824135 515463 191133 852936 543137 148755 062830 259265 > 3198
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (64, 199, 270)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |