Information on Result #483571

There is no (66, 204, 279)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 26 037292 023120 767771 615270 610401 068594 933396 235487 816665 746036 479901 555959 081824 946347 857059 630951 > 3204

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 205, 279)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction