Information on Result #483981

There is no (126, 210, 1966)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 15991 782589 040262 228279 973863 717290 660394 456426 862512 630780 619410 597613 609566 970384 813549 012210 555245 > 3210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 211, 1966)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction