Information on Result #485396

There is no (129, 231, 1389)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 165 774042 936123 553764 299628 594634 244601 082081 112083 164566 314251 098020 057840 768798 323182 760775 294924 079148 424971 > 3231

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 232, 1389)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction