Information on Result #486190
There is no (128, 242, 1116)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 29 310189 617968 969093 934558 160231 627434 849671 862590 859966 649179 008388 598421 736002 177805 936982 034935 749417 389957 306681 > 3242
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (128, 243, 1116)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |