Information on Result #486731

There is no (165, 249, 5524)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 64022 956953 925816 841526 381454 646545 042307 276169 882882 316291 040509 111670 728119 761334 653430 037742 182116 292236 489483 662361 > 3249

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 250, 5524)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction