Information on Result #486735

There is no (173, 249, 10013)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 63628 983636 084867 560099 759766 419208 071824 673949 242734 687245 843607 243132 974643 730258 050184 924956 518682 700838 516810 050481 > 3249

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (173, 250, 10013)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction