Information on Result #488095

There is no (51, 89, 1732)-net in base 4, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 384683 754212 657508 087485 414979 160565 865992 750929 090732 > 489

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 90, 1732)-net in base 4 [i]m-Reduction