Information on Result #488254

There is no (29, 95, 212)-net in base 4, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 4m ≥ 1684 942017 759560 739409 662152 971596 553082 905112 486264 361070 > 495

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 96, 212)-net in base 4 [i]m-Reduction