Information on Result #497138
There is no (2, 6, 44)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 16193 > 56
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (2, 7, 44)-net in base 5 | [i] | m-Reduction | |