Information on Result #497144
There is no (4, 8, 220)-net in base 5, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 5m ≥ 390721 > 58
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (4, 9, 220)-net in base 5 | [i] | m-Reduction | |