Information on Result #502431
There is no (4, 10, 265)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 1081 110696 > 810
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (4, 11, 265)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |