Information on Result #502444
There is no (2, 14, 52)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 4 666928 710900 > 814
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (2, 15, 52)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (2, 16, 52)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (2, 17, 52)-net in base 8 | [i] | ||