Information on Result #502592

There is no (10, 34, 267)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 5 209207 894696 538823 451853 692992 > 834

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (10, 35, 267)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction