Information on Result #503026

There is no (16, 64, 344)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6373 002289 621545 630556 562101 804762 805921 294462 022196 182424 > 864

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 65, 344)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction