Information on Result #503026
There is no (16, 64, 344)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 6373 002289 621545 630556 562101 804762 805921 294462 022196 182424 > 864
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (16, 65, 344)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |