Information on Result #503089

There is no (29, 67, 1721)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 3 217085 951102 502560 824427 498280 471012 743063 590933 703722 112136 > 867

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 68, 1721)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction