Information on Result #503488

There is no (35, 85, 1695)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 58218 160228 117640 849530 123348 424495 739179 171495 509220 149448 616964 824067 980622 > 885

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (35, 86, 1695)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction