Information on Result #503578
There is no (64, 88, 3169001)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 29 642845 812393 080860 236228 287091 096265 742793 966317 248087 376102 456507 604871 571736 > 888
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (64, 89, 3169001)-net in base 8 | [i] | m-Reduction |