Information on Result #503578

There is no (64, 88, 3169001)-net in base 8, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 8m ≥ 29 642845 812393 080860 236228 287091 096265 742793 966317 248087 376102 456507 604871 571736 > 888

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (64, 89, 3169001)-net in base 8 [i]m-Reduction